MA
Muhammad AldiansyahBlue Team Defense Hub
Evidence-led defense

Sigma Detection Engineering

Write portable, testable behavior detections with explicit telemetry assumptions and response context.

On this page · 4 sections
01

Operating context

Sigma can express detection intent, but field mappings, backend semantics, and environment baselines determine whether a rule works in practice.

  • Define the security decision that sigma detection engineering must support.
  • Assign accountable owners, escalation paths, service levels, and privacy boundaries.
  • Measure signal quality, response consistency, operational cost, and improvement over time.
02

Operational workflow

  1. 01

    Establish scope, dependencies, normal behavior, and a documented baseline.

  2. 02

    Collect the minimum telemetry and context needed for sigma detection engineering.

  3. 03

    Correlate independent signals and state confidence before taking disruptive action.

  4. 04

    Document the decision, evidence, containment or control action, and responsible owner.

  5. 05

    Review the outcome, tune the process, and validate the improvement with a safe test.

03

Signals, evidence & decisions

Signal or artifactDecision it supports
versioned Sigma rule and test casesEstablish event sequence and affected scope.
field mapping and backend queryConfirm identity, asset, or control context.
alert samples and analyst feedbackSupport containment, recovery, or tuning.

Record source, timestamp, collection method, confidence, owner, and disposition. Preserve the smallest useful evidence set and document any uncertainty.

04

Implementation & improvement

  • Document log source and required fields.
  • Test positive, negative, and noisy cases.
  • Track ATT&CK mapping as context, not proof of coverage.

Official references

NIST SP 800-92 — Log ManagementMITRE ATT&CK Data Sources