MA
Muhammad AldiansyahBlue Team Defense Hub
Evidence-led defense

Identity Threat Hunting

Hunt for suspicious authentication, privilege use, consent, session, and recovery behavior.

On this page · 4 sections
01

Operating context

Identity hunts connect user baselines, device trust, authentication strength, session context, privilege changes, and resource access across providers.

  • Define the security decision that identity threat hunting must support.
  • Assign accountable owners, escalation paths, service levels, and privacy boundaries.
  • Measure signal quality, response consistency, operational cost, and improvement over time.
02

Operational workflow

  1. 01

    Establish scope, dependencies, normal behavior, and a documented baseline.

  2. 02

    Collect the minimum telemetry and context needed for identity threat hunting.

  3. 03

    Correlate independent signals and state confidence before taking disruptive action.

  4. 04

    Document the decision, evidence, containment or control action, and responsible owner.

  5. 05

    Review the outcome, tune the process, and validate the improvement with a safe test.

03

Signals, evidence & decisions

Signal or artifactDecision it supports
authentication and session eventsEstablish event sequence and affected scope.
privilege, consent, and recovery changesConfirm identity, asset, or control context.
device, network, and resource contextSupport containment, recovery, or tuning.

Record source, timestamp, collection method, confidence, owner, and disposition. Preserve the smallest useful evidence set and document any uncertainty.

04

Implementation & improvement

  • Model service and human identities separately.
  • Account for travel, automation, and proxy behavior.
  • Prioritize high-impact identities and unusual control changes.

Official references

MITRE ATT&CKNIST SP 800-137