MA
Muhammad AldiansyahGRC Assurance Center
Governance with evidence

Third-Party Risk Management

Assess and monitor security, privacy, resilience, and concentration risk across the supplier lifecycle.

On this page · 4 sections
01

Applicability & intent

Third-party risk begins before contracting and continues through onboarding, change, monitoring, incident coordination, renewal, and termination. Criticality determines depth.

  • Document why third-party risk management applies, what is in scope, and who is accountable.
  • Translate obligations into owned, testable outcomes with proportionate evidence.
  • Track exceptions, residual risk, changes, and corrective actions through governance review.
02

Governance lifecycle

  1. 01

    Confirm scope, context, interested parties, legal or contractual basis, and authoritative sources.

  2. 02

    Identify desired outcomes, owners, dependencies, existing controls, and evidence sources.

  3. 03

    Assess design and operating effectiveness using representative, time-bound evidence.

  4. 04

    Record gaps, risk, interim protections, target dates, and approval decisions.

  5. 05

    Verify remediation, report residual risk, and schedule reassessment when context changes.

03

Evidence & assurance

Evidence familyAssurance question
supplier inventory and criticalityDoes governance establish accountable direction?
due diligence and contract requirementsDoes the process operate consistently?
monitoring, incidents, and offboarding evidenceCan the claimed outcome be independently verified?

Evidence should be attributable, current, protected, reproducible, and linked to an accountable owner. A document alone does not demonstrate that a control operates effectively.

04

Readiness decisions

  • Tier suppliers by business and data impact.
  • Validate material claims with proportionate evidence.
  • Include breach, deletion, subcontractor, and exit obligations.

Official references

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0NIST Computer Security Resource Center